Entries tagged with “eu” from Domains / Internet Technology News - DNS News
CENTR is celebrating its tenth anniversary this year.
The organisation brings together ccTLD managers from the four corners of the globe, though with a focus on Europe.
On December 2, 2009, they are organising a seminar in Brussels entitled: Who should Govern the Internet?
The event is being held to promote CENTR to EU officials as a resource for all things DNS (to paraphrase CENTR's Andrzej Bartosiewicz)
It will be interesting to see how such an event is received.
The organisation brings together ccTLD managers from the four corners of the globe, though with a focus on Europe.
On December 2, 2009, they are organising a seminar in Brussels entitled: Who should Govern the Internet?
The event is being held to promote CENTR to EU officials as a resource for all things DNS (to paraphrase CENTR's Andrzej Bartosiewicz)
It will be interesting to see how such an event is received.
Image via Wikipedia
Unfortunately some governments didn't take advantage of this, with the end result being that the .eu launch led to domains like cork.eu and dublin.eu being registered to organisations with questionable entitlements.
Later this year Eurid will be launching IDNs in .eu. In simple terms you'll be able to register domain names using characters other than standard ASCII - think accents, Cyrillic etc.,
And again, as .eu is run by the EU, governments were given ample opportunity to get names added to a reserve list.
However, the Irish government seems to have all but dropped the ball - again!
While other governments submitted large numbers of names, the Irish one seems to have restricted itself to IDN versions of "Ireland" and "Irish". What's even more insane is that they didn't even bother putting a block on the word "dáil", which is the Irish parliament!
Here's the list (excuse the formatting, but the copy and paste from a PDF didn't work too well):
1. irlanda
2. irsko
3. irland
4. iirimaa
5. ireland
6. irlande
7. irlanda
8. Īrija
9. Airija
10. Írország
11. L-Irlanda
12. iρλανδία
13. ierland
14. irlandia
15. Írsko
16. irska
17. irlanti
18. irland
19. .irlande
20. Ιρλανδία
21. irlande
22. republicofireland
23. eire
24. irelànd
25. irelánd
26. irelánd
27. irelánd
28. irelând
29. irelãnd
30. ireländ
31. irelånd
32. irelænd
33. irèland
34. iréland
35. irêland
36. irëland
37. ìreland
38. íreland
39. îreland
40. ireland
41. irelan•
42. irelañd
43. irelānd
44. irelănd
45. ireląnd
46. irelanď
47. irelanđ
48. irēland
49. irěland
50. irėland
51. iręland
52. irěland
53. ĩreland
54. īreland
55. ĭreland
56. įreland
57. ıreland
58. irelańd
59. irelaņd
60. irelaňd
61. irelaʼnd
62. irelaŋd
63. iŕeland
64. iŗeland
65. iřeland
66. ирландия
You can download the full PDF here

Anti-virus vendor McAfee have released their second report on Malware (pdf) which tracks incidences of malware on a TLD basis.
The previous report, which received a lot of press coverage, was very favourable for several ccTLDs, including .ie (Ireland).
This time round the Irish ccTLD may not be listed in the "dangerous" list, but the threat levels have practically doubled!
This year's report also includes data on .eu, which is showing that over 2% of EU sites are dangerous.
However those figures pale in comparison to the 19% risk rate of .hk (Hong Kong) or the 11% of .cn (China).
With such a high incidence of risk concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region the new dotAsia TLD will have its work cut out, or risk being flagged in a similar manner to .info (11.7% risk)
More coverage over on the excellent Domain Name News site
The previous report, which received a lot of press coverage, was very favourable for several ccTLDs, including .ie (Ireland).
This time round the Irish ccTLD may not be listed in the "dangerous" list, but the threat levels have practically doubled!
This year's report also includes data on .eu, which is showing that over 2% of EU sites are dangerous.
However those figures pale in comparison to the 19% risk rate of .hk (Hong Kong) or the 11% of .cn (China).
With such a high incidence of risk concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region the new dotAsia TLD will have its work cut out, or risk being flagged in a similar manner to .info (11.7% risk)
More coverage over on the excellent Domain Name News site
In some ways the failure of .eu to capture hearts and minds makes me sad. I'm European. I'd like to think that a European namespace could be a success, but that seems to be a misplaced desire.
As I mentioned some time ago, the only way to grow a namespace or TLD is through usage. Once people start to see a domain extension in "action" then they begin to start using it. If people start using it then everyone benefits - registry, registrars, "normal" registrants and domain investors alike.
When was the last time you saw a high profile .eu site?
You'd have to think long and hard about it, wouldn't you?
Even the "big boys" aren't really using their .eu domains actively.
Google.eu doesn't have any A records ie. it doesn't point anywhere.
Yahoo.eu points to a Yahoo site, but not to the European one!
Ebay.eu actually does what you'd expect it to do, but it was the only one I could find when I did a quick search this evening.
Why do I bring this up?
Last week John McCormack sent me some preliminary statistics on domain usage for the EU namespace and the figures were quite worrying. He's since published a blog piece with a breakdown of the stats and if I were in Eurid I'd be sobbing.
You can read John's article, but the basic underlying truth is hard to avoid.
Adoption of .eu has been pretty bad and that's being diplomatic about it.
While there may be a large number of domains registered only a very small fraction are in active use, with many simply redirecting to a ccTLD equivalent or being parked.
Launching a new TLD is not easy.
Afilias have resorted over the past couple of years to literally giving away domains for free and it looks like Eurid are adopting a similar approach.
DotMobi, however, have worked hard to build up interest in their TLD among users of all shapes and sizes and got the investors interested as well.
What will the future hold for .eu?
Will their PR pay off or will it all fizzle out?
As I mentioned some time ago, the only way to grow a namespace or TLD is through usage. Once people start to see a domain extension in "action" then they begin to start using it. If people start using it then everyone benefits - registry, registrars, "normal" registrants and domain investors alike.
When was the last time you saw a high profile .eu site?
You'd have to think long and hard about it, wouldn't you?
Even the "big boys" aren't really using their .eu domains actively.
Google.eu doesn't have any A records ie. it doesn't point anywhere.
Yahoo.eu points to a Yahoo site, but not to the European one!
Ebay.eu actually does what you'd expect it to do, but it was the only one I could find when I did a quick search this evening.
Why do I bring this up?
Last week John McCormack sent me some preliminary statistics on domain usage for the EU namespace and the figures were quite worrying. He's since published a blog piece with a breakdown of the stats and if I were in Eurid I'd be sobbing.
You can read John's article, but the basic underlying truth is hard to avoid.
Adoption of .eu has been pretty bad and that's being diplomatic about it.
While there may be a large number of domains registered only a very small fraction are in active use, with many simply redirecting to a ccTLD equivalent or being parked.
Launching a new TLD is not easy.
Afilias have resorted over the past couple of years to literally giving away domains for free and it looks like Eurid are adopting a similar approach.
DotMobi, however, have worked hard to build up interest in their TLD among users of all shapes and sizes and got the investors interested as well.
What will the future hold for .eu?
Will their PR pay off or will it all fizzle out?
According to the latest report from Eurid to the EU Commission usage of .eu domains is up based on DNS query volumes.
Seemingly registrants average 2.6 domains each!
The full report is available for download as a PDF
Seemingly registrants average 2.6 domains each!
The full report is available for download as a PDF
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=433ab8f1-7366-43b6-98c5-0caabf9a1325)




Recent Comments