Domains: May 2008 Archives

Image via Wikipedia
In most cases decisions are either upheld or denied and when they are upheld the normal followup would be for the domain in question to be transferred to the IP holder.
However WIPO's latest set of UDRP decisions shows a different line of thought entirely.
In several cases involving pharmaceutical products the panel has decided in favour of cancelling the domains.
But what is to stop someone from simply re-registering them again? Couldn't I or anyone else just grab the domains as soon as they became available for registration.
Maybe I'm missing some finer detail that only an "inner circle" is privy to.





Recent Comments
Tom Murphy on High Profile DNS Still Vulnerable To Kaminsky Exploit: I'm the fo
Michele Neylon on High Profile DNS Still Vulnerable To Kaminsky Exploit: Dan Thank
Dan Kaminsky on High Profile DNS Still Vulnerable To Kaminsky Exploit: Not really
Ken on ICANN Ignoring Deadlines: Lets hope
Dave on ICM Registry's Graphic of ICANN options: Seems simp
Hosting365 Accreditation Sunk on Domain Registry Of America Get Slapped In UK: McCarron l
Francesco on EU IDNs - Some Governments Still Don't Get It!: Actually i
Michele Neylon on Food Fight Anyone?: Jorge Nic
Jorge on Food Fight Anyone?: Coming soo